Either way I supppppose firefox has served me fairly well despite its memory issues, I do like how when I move computers I don’t have to do sod all other than copy bookmark files etc and I do like tab abuse and the huge collection of fairly well made plugins. I mean lets face it firefox trumps microsofts dishwasher anyday.
In appreciation, and because they are trying to get more people using it so googlezilla becomes even more of a monopoly and gets more dollars per household heres some random photo firefoxage. If you want credit for these images mail my ass @ seounderworld.com

Google webmasters latest post features what is the almost a “how not to film a presentation” guide, in fact thats what I would rename it. “how not to film a presentation, featuring a hot chick talking ip delivery”.

What I don’t get is how they are gonna draw the line between localisation and different content, if we are allowed to provide different content specific to geo localised areas then as the internet expands and ips become more linked with locations (a possibility I think) google is going to have to have either a lot of bots across the world or expect tailored pages that when hashed do not match! “A program such as md5sum or diff can compute a hash to verify that two different files are identical.” – but you have said we can geolocalise a bit so they are gonna be different – and surely if we are trying to improve the website for each user is the bot not a user – cloaking is just giving it what it wants (lol) I don’t cloak by the way I’m just a bystander.

It’d be ideal if we could some how embed our zipcode/postalcode into our browsers – giving webmasters real ability to geolocalize – I have built a few sites that use postcode entry on logon but its an imperfect system for countless reasons.